Mega Bankstargetiran.jpg

Mega-Banks Plan to Steal Your Money — Iran Will be Blamed

After the US banks allegedly received a warning to prepare for total collapse, and all legal bank deposit protections have been pulled off, I’ve stumbled across more bad news.

According to Susanne Posel (Chief Editor of Occupy Corporatism), the mega-banks are planning to steal our money, collapse the US dollar, and blame everything on Iran. In my opinion, this is the most probable scenario yet, for at least three different reasons: it is the easiest to stage, the least messy and, finally, it presents a serious motive to invade Iran. 

The third one is imperative at this point, because the crushing majority of the US population doesn’t want another war; but at the same time, the invasion of Iran is crucial for the agenda of the Shadow Government (SG).

The Mega-Banks and Shadow Government are targeting Iran

“Senator and self-proclaimed Zionist Joseph Lieberman declared that it was Iran who cyber-attacked Bank of America and JPMorgan Chase in 2011 and began with more frequency this year. Lieberman, as the chairman of the Homeland Security and Government Affairs Committee states that the financial attack was spurned from the state-sponsored anti-Muslim film circulating the Middle East thanks to CIA-operatives al-Qaeda.
Lieberman explains: ‘I don’t believe these were just hackers. I believe this was done by Iran and the Qods force, which has its own developing cyber-attack capacity. And I believe it was in response to the increasingly strong economic sanctions that the United States and our European allies have put on Iranian financial institutions.’

The US government is planting the propaganda seed that according to ‘highly classified’ documents provided by the Join Chiefs of Staff’s Intelligence Directorate confirm that Iranian hackers are committing cyber-attacks against US financial institutions.

This report assures that US mega-banks are a ‘valid target’ of the Iranian ‘cyber army’. However, the attackers used a known forum that is utilized by the CIA-controlled Anonymous to issue threats and brag about their successes.” — Susan Posel.

The US control in the Middle East

In the “game” of world domination, the SG (operating directly through USA, UK, NATO and ONU) wants the Middle East under its total control. Having Israel as a motivated ally, and permanent bases in multiple countries in the region, the shadow government took action and eliminated those who didn’t want to be used as pawns in their sick “game”.

As I have presented before (read Wars VS. Coups), the armed conflicts are not so easily tolerated anymore. Instead of invading sovereign countries and face serious accusations (while spending enormous amounts of money), the SG prefers to install into power a corrupted pro-USA presidency — this way conquering the country and having access to their resources, all without spending a dime, firing a single shot, or having to face social distress.

But things get complicated when the leader of a country is a dictator or an incorruptible patriot. In these cases, the SG tries to overthrow the leadership through a well-staged coup (presented to the world as a “people’s revolution”), and install to power their own puppet. 

Examples of recent coups in the Middle East (From West to East): Tunisia, Libya, Egypt, Syria (ongoing), Yemen (ongoing).

The USA’s control (through wars and coups) in the Middle East

Currently, coups are being prepared in Niger, Jordan, Oman, Azerbaijan and Pakistan (hint: Google for each). According to the press, the inhabitants of these countries have been inspired by the current flame of “revolutions” burning like wild-fire throughout the Middle East — yeah, right!

Unfortunately for the shadow government, they cannot overthrow all governments with staged coups. One example is Iraq under dictator Saddam Hussein, where military intervention was required in order to take the power from his hands — and it was quite an effort (staging 9/11, spreading fake rumors of WMDs, and finally: spending as much as $3,7 trillion without counting the 2012 expenditures + $1 trillion future expenditures with war veterans and thousands of lost lives, in 11 years of war).

Another example is Iran under president Mahmoud Ahmadinejad. At this point, the only option for the SG to take Iran from his hands, is a military intervention.

Susanne Posel closes the article by coherently stating that by “framing Iran for the American banking system’s computer failure kills two birds with one stone. Not only would the banking cartels be able to shut down all banking computers (and simultaneously siphon the remaining money in their customers’ accounts) but also use this fake cyber-attack to engage the American public against Iran and justify their highly anticipated military strike. 

By blaming Iran, the technocrats could initiate the shutdown of all domestic banking computer systems in order to “purge” the virus and reconfigure their systems. However, this would be a false flag meant to pacify the public to avert mass panic. While the general public would fall for the cover story, the banking cartels would simply electronically transfer all customer funds from private checking accounts out to off-shore banks where they could not be touched and cover their tracks.

The American public, being told that Iran was to blame might not riot in the streets as we have seen in European countries of late. There would be total support for the war with Iran if this scheme could be pulled off. The technocrats could not only bankrupt America but also simultaneously stave off a social display and breakdown of society because the Iranians would be to blame.

The plan is perfect. All we have to do is not be fooled and use the recent riots in Spain as a barometer as to how we can take this country back from the Zionists and the banking cartels.”

I couldn’t agree more! We truly have the power to crumble this corrupted system to the ground and free ourselves from the financial slavery: the key is a correct understanding of the world-wide events and peaceful mass non-compliance.